jeudi 31 mars 2011

Bless : between fashion & design


Bless was created in 1997 in Berlin by Desiree Heiss and Ines Kaag, two German designers.
They are unconventional and don't want to become celebrities (there are no pictures of them).

Expression & Signification

This cable brings out the multiple use we can do of Bless's cable jewelry. Although it has been designed with clear allusions to jewelry, it has more than the decorative function of traditional jewels, and it is not (only) meant to serve on the human body. These cables have been transformed into an aesthetic object thar can be desplayed in an interior. It puts emphasis on an element which is usually hidden, and renews our vision of it.

The cables below have a more ambiguous functionality. The use of small beads suggests they can be worn as necklaces.
Their uniqueness enhances their value for the owner. Interactions with the brand Bless (bringing one of your cables to their boutique) account for the creation of a unique piece of art, somewhere between jewelry and design, the original object somewhat being stripped out of its genuine utility by the ornaments.





Wearing or displaying these cables also suggests to the world something about your lifestyle and taste. Although it is one of Bless's least expensive items, it is also one which shows the brand's radical approach to fashion, being both a challenge to wear, making reference somewhat to Native Art, and proposing an artistic reflection on a piece of furniture that completely invade modern interior. These cables, the possibility of having several of them, suggests a possible transformation of modern interior, which goes beyond what we usually expect of fashion.
Bless's cable jewellery

mercredi 16 mars 2011

Urban Glass House - Philip Johnson

Who was Philip Johnson ?
Why did we choose the Urban Glass House?
What is Philip Johnson’s view of design? What was its evolution?
How is this vision linked to the glass house?
He was an American architect born in 1906, he died in 2005.
He studied at Harvard philosophy and history but began to concentrate on architecture after a trip to Europe.He analyzed the architecture international style in the pre-war period and experienced different ways of understanding the aims of architecture, from modernism to post-modernism.
He was really influenced at the beginning of its career by Mies van der Rohe with who he designed the Seagram Building in New York which is very simple and minimalist.

The urban glass house was the last project of Philip Johnson
It comes back to the idea of Glass House of Philip Johnson. He designed his house in Connecticut as a glass box.Therefore we thought that this building would be a good way of understanding Johnson’s work.
Philip Johnson studied the “international style architecture” in Europe in his early days (1930s) and he found out that (1) solidity was not guaranteed any more by mass and architecture was more and more based on volume and lightness (2) symmetry was rejected (3) along with decoration. It traduced both a minimalist spirit (“Less is More”) and modernism because buildings were trying to escape previous canons.
He based his first works on this view of design (e.g. Kunsthalle Bielefeld, Germany; Seagram Building)Then he moved (as everyone: cul-de-sac of modernism) to postmodernism notably with the AT&T building with a Chippendale Wardrobe top (Manhattan).
He opposes to the heavy metallic building appearance and prefers light and pure design with glass as a predilection raw material.
We will understand the links in more details later on with the analysis of the building.
Basically, the minimalist view is well represented by the absence of ornamentation, the purity of design and the simplicity of forms.
The Urban glass house reveals a modern design coupled with the idea of cubes with which you can play and build a pile such as with Lego®

To see all his work: http://www.pjar.com/projects_type_theaters.html (website of Philip Johnson/Alan Ritchie Architects)

Style and originality

Glass buildings and scrycrapers are usually office buildings or mall buildings, but this time it a residential building
Large pillars and finer pillars, the former is on what the building rests and the later has only aesthetical function.
The external walls are all windows
It contrasts with the neighboring buildings. Classical brick-made buildings:



It has a light and airy look

_________________________________________________

Expression

As its name says, this building is a house. It is made to live in, in one of the 39 flats or in the penthouse.

But Philip Johnson and Alan Ritchie wanted to do more than a simple house. They highlight one characteristic of the house that is to be a shelter. People inside have a lot of lights thanks to these large glass windows but people outside cannot see inside, they only see the reflection of the facing buildings. So it gives the inhabitants an impression of protection in this busy city. Alan Ritchie says it well: “the outcome is a calm, ordered residential building that will provide a wonderful sense of refuge, a haven of quiet elegance and privacy within New York City."


Signification

When people are looking for a house, they want to like it and to be able to live well in it but they are also considering what the house says about them. Indeed a house represents who live in. So what does the urban glass house say about its inhabitants?

It says they are sophisticated. First because of the style of the urban glass house that is elegant thanks to its pure lines. This impression of elegance applies to the people who live in. Secondly, the inhabitants look sophisticated because they live in a famous building by a famous architect. So it means that they are cultivated, that they know the reference to the glass house of Philip Johnson and to the international style.

So as the building is elegant and the product of a well-known architect, its inhabitants seem sophisticated. But the Urban Glass House says another thing about them. It says they are wealthy. Indeed, they can afford to live there.

These two conclusions about the inhabitants of this building lead me to my last point. The Urban Glass House is a luxury building. Indeed, as it costs a lot to live there, it becomes a signal of privileges and thanks to its sophistication we can guess the connoisseurship of the inhabitants, as Chippendale’s work did for the Dumfries. So clearly even if everybody can admire it walking in the street, the building is for the elite. Indeed “the mass” cannot enjoy the main function of the building as the impossibility to see inside from the street symbolically suggests.

mardi 15 mars 2011

The Urban Glass House




330 Spring Street in SoHo, New York - The building is at Washington Street and is very close to West and Canal Streets. Philip Johnson, Alan Ritchie

Medium and Value - Eléonore

"These homes were expressly created to address new modes of living, and with a recognition that the greatest luxury consists of perfect proportions, carefully chosen materials, attention to every detail, and the most exquisite craftsmanship."

The interior designer, "Ms. Selldorf used a palette of black, gray and silver and matte and reflective surfaces in the interiors. "The honed black granite surfaces, stainless steel counter tops on the kitchen island, and the anthracite color of the cabinetry add up to an expression of utilitarian elegance," according to the project's website, which added that "dark gray limestone...sets a tone of minimalist purity" in the bathrooms."

Glass is also an obviously important material. The windows are made of five panels of glass ; in some stairs, the corner apartement resemble a glass cube.


The floor is in white oak, an expensive wood, organised in a chevron pattern designed by the interior designer.

Something very important to remember about this building and its apartment is the luxury of the materials used, which adds value to these apartments. The best example is probably the kitchens : Selldorf had them designed by Bulthaup, the prestigious kitchen brand, with an initial price aorund 20,000$.


dimanche 13 mars 2011

Philip Johnson

Some info about Philip Johnson:

Philip Johnson (1906-2005) was an American architect .
He studied philosophy at Harvard University and interrupted his education several times to go to Europe. It was there that he discovered architecture: he was commissioned by the creator of the Museum of Modern Art (MoMa), Alfred Hamilton Barr, to find the trends in modern architecture. In 1932, he became head of the department of architecture at MoMa. With Barr and Hitchcock, he created the exhibition Modern Architecture: International Style. The publication of the book by Hitchcock and Johnson The International Style: Architecture Since 1922 followed. These two works were very influential.
He did some politics. He was a great admirer of Mies Van Der Rohe's monumentality, purity and tenuous connections with classicism.
From 1946 to 1951, Johnson had his own office in partnership with Landes Gores.

First famous work: in 1949, the Glass House in New Canaan, Connecticut (http://philipjohnsonglasshouse.org/)


At the beginning he was influenced by architects of the international style but when it had become commonplace in America he turned away from it. He was iconoclast and his position was quite complex. "He promoted then subverted the international stylen did teh smae to Post-modernism, and repeated the feat with Deconstructivism."
1988: curator of the exhibition Deconstructivist Architecture at MoMa.

"All architecture is shelter, all great architecture is the design of space that contains, cuddles, exalts, or stimulates the persons in that space." Philip Johnson

If you want to know more about him:


Some long interviews:

mercredi 9 mars 2011

About Jasper Morrison and boundaries

Jasper Morrison not only graduated in design in an engineering school (Kingston polytechnic design School) but also at the Royal College of Art.
But does he consider himself as an artist or a designer? In fact, Jasper Morrison is someone rather inconspicuous. Rather than considering his work as an art as such, he prefers emphasizing the importance of design as a way of enhancing the utilitarian functions of an object.

However, if he does not blur the boundary between the designer and the artist, he really blurs a lot of other boundaries.

His two diplomas rather help him blurring the difference between the designer and the engineer, which makes the fact that he puts a stress on utilitarian aspects all the more true. With the Basel Chair, he wants to create a comfortable chair and he adapts the classic wooden chair with synthetic elements to reach this aim.

He also blurs the boundary between the analyst and the designer. With the “Take a chair” and the “Supernormal” exhibitions, he manages to establish a reflection on design, still based on the utilitarian and everywhere-fitting characteristic of design. The real artistic value of a well designed objects stems not from ornaments or luxury but rather from its daily-use suitability.

Time considerations are also blurred by Jasper Morrison, notably with the Basel Chair which is a renewed, modern version of a classic archetype: the wooden chair. Jasper Morrison likes to create objects that will be timeless.

Finally, Jasper Morrison blurs boundaries of culture. His objects are so pure, so sheer and simple that they transcend culture; they can be and are used everywhere in the world, whatever the culture. His exhibition “Supernormal” with Naoto Fukasawa is a good example of that vision. Objects that are displayed on the long table are used everywhere in the world and we do not even notice them because of a design we consider universal and which is first characterized by its utilitarian qualities.